Abstract
Academic conferences are among the most prolific scientific activities, yet the current abstract submission and review process has serious limitations. We propose a revised process that would address these limitations, achieve some of the aims of Open Science, and stimulate discussion throughout the entire lifecycle of the scientific work.
Highlights
The value of poster sessions at large interand review process has serious lim- while those for the 2018 Annual Meeting national conferences becomes unclear
We propose a revised pro- of the Organization of Human Brain Map- A second option is to quickly analyse the cess that would address these ping (OHBM) state data to be able to include preliminary, and limitations, achieve some of the aims of Open Science, and stimulate discussion throughout the entire
For the major cognitive neuroscience might already be a preprint on an archive leagues is an essential means for testing conferences, researchers need to submit and possibly in press or even in print with their validity, feasibility, consistency, and their abstracts approximately 5 months a journal
Summary
The value of poster sessions at large interand review process has serious lim- while those for the 2018 Annual Meeting national conferences becomes unclear. Such results are likely to change by the time of has already been completed, not the conference, leaving the researcher lifecycle of the scientific work.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
