Abstract

Anaplasma phagocytophilum are transmitted by Ixodes spp. ticks and have become one of the most common and relevant tick-borne pathogens due to their impact on human and animal health. Recent results have increased our understanding of the molecular interactions between Ixodes scapularis and A. phagocytophilum through the demonstration of tissue-specific molecular pathways that ensure pathogen infection, development and transmission by ticks. However, little is known about the Ixodes ricinus genes and proteins involved in the response to A. phagocytophilum infection. The tick species I. scapularis and I. ricinus are evolutionarily closely related and therefore similar responses are expected in A. phagocytophilum-infected cells. However, differences may exist between I. scapularis ISE6 and I. ricinus IRE/CTVM20 tick cells associated with tissue-specific signatures of these cell lines. To address this hypothesis, the transcriptional response to A. phagocytophilum infection was characterized by RNA sequencing and compared between I. scapularis ISE6 and I. ricinus IRE/CTVM20 tick cell lines. The transcriptional response to infection of I. scapularis ISE6 cells resembled that of tick hemocytes while the response in I. ricinus IRE/CTVM20 cells was more closely related to that reported previously in infected tick midguts. The inhibition of cell apoptosis by A. phagocytophilum appears to be a key adaptation mechanism to facilitate infection of both vertebrate and tick cells and was used to investigate further the tissue-specific response of tick cell lines to pathogen infection. The results supported a role for the intrinsic pathway in the inhibition of cell apoptosis by A. phagocytophilum infection of I. scapularis ISE6 cells. In contrast, the results in I. ricinus IRE/CTVM20 cells were similar to those obtained in tick midguts and suggested a role for the JAK/STAT pathway in the inhibition of apoptosis in tick cells infected with A. phagocytophilum. Nevertheless, tick cell lines were derived from embryonated eggs and may contain various cell populations with different morphology and behavior that could affect transcriptional response to infection. These results suggested tissue-specific signatures in I. scapularis ISE6 and I. ricinus IRE/CTVM20 tick cell line response to A. phagocytophilum infection that support their use as models for the study of tick-pathogen interactions.

Highlights

  • Anaplasma phagocytophilum (Rickettsiales: Anaplasmataceae) is the causative agent of human granulocytic anaplasmosis (HGA), equine and canine granulocytic anaplasmosis, and tick-borne fever of ruminants (TBF; Severo et al, 2015)

  • The I. scapularis ISE6 and I. ricinus IRE/CTVM20 tick cell lines were derived from embryonated eggs and contain cells with different morphology and behavior (Munderloh et al, 1994; Bell-Sakyi et al, 2007)

  • The results obtained in the present study provided support for our hypothesis and suggested the presence of tissue-specific signatures in tick cell line response to A. phagocytophilum infection

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Anaplasma phagocytophilum (Rickettsiales: Anaplasmataceae) is the causative agent of human granulocytic anaplasmosis (HGA), equine and canine granulocytic anaplasmosis, and tick-borne fever of ruminants (TBF; Severo et al, 2015). A. phagocytophilum are transmitted by Ixodes scapularis and I. pacificus in the United States and by I. ricinus in Europe becoming one of the most common and relevant tick-borne pathogens in these regions due to their impact on human and animal health (Goodman, 2005; Stuen, 2007; Severo et al, 2015). Recent results have increased our understanding of I. scapularis–A. phagocytophilum interactions through the demonstration of tissue-specific molecular pathways that ensure A. phagocytophilum infection, development and transmission by ticks (Ayllón et al, 2013, 2015a; Villar et al, 2015a,b). Little is known about the genes and proteins of I. ricinus involved in the response to A. phagocytophilum infection (Alberdi et al, 2015; Ayllón et al, 2015b)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call