Abstract

BackgroundGrasses are lignocellulosic materials useful to supply the billion-tons annual requirement for renewable resources that aim to produce transportation fuels and a variety of chemicals. However, the polysaccharides contained in grass cell walls are built in a recalcitrant composite. Deconstruction of these cell walls is still a challenge for the energy-efficient and economically viable transformation of lignocellulosic materials. The varied tissue-specific distribution of cell wall components adds complexity to the origins of cell wall recalcitrance in grasses. This complexity usually led to empirically developed pretreatment processes to overcome recalcitrance. A further complication is that efficient pretreatment procedures generally treat the less recalcitrant tissues more than necessary, which results in the generation of undesirable biomass degradation products.ResultsSix different sugarcane hybrids were used as model grasses to evaluate the tissue-specific distribution of hemicelluloses and the role of these components in cell wall recalcitrance. Acetylated glucuronoarabinoxylan (GAX) occurs in all tissues. Mixed-linkage glucan (MLG) was relevant in the innermost regions of the sugarcane internodes (up to 15.4 % w/w), especially in the low-lignin content hybrids. Immunofluorescence microscopy showed that xylans predominated in vascular bundles, whereas MLG occurred mostly in the parenchyma cell walls from the pith region of the hybrids with low-lignin content. Evaluation of the digestibility of sugarcane polysaccharides by commercial enzymes indicated that the cell wall recalcitrance varied considerably along the internode regions and in the sugarcane hybrids. Pith regions of the hybrids with high MLG and low-lignin contents reached up to 85 % cellulose conversion after 72 h of hydrolysis, without any pretreatment.ConclusionsThe collective characteristics of the internode regions were related to the varied recalcitrance found in the samples. Components such as lignin and GAX were critical for the increased recalcitrance, but low cellulose crystallinity index, high MLG contents, and highly substituted GAX contributed to the generation of a less recalcitrant material.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13068-016-0513-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Highlights

  • Grasses are lignocellulosic materials useful to supply the billion-tons annual requirement for renew‐ able resources that aim to produce transportation fuels and a variety of chemicals

  • After evaluating a number of sugarcane hybrids, we suggested that the fibers and vessels contained in the vascular bundles are recalcitrant due to low cellulose availability, measured as the glucan content divided by the sum of lignin plus hemicellulose

  • The results showed that xylose (9–19 %), followed by glucose (1–12 %) and arabinose (1.7–3.9 %), was the most abundant monosaccharide released by mild trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) hydrolysis (Additional file 1: Table S1)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Grasses are lignocellulosic materials useful to supply the billion-tons annual requirement for renew‐ able resources that aim to produce transportation fuels and a variety of chemicals. The polysaccharides contained in grass cell walls are built in a recalcitrant composite Deconstruction of these cell walls is still a challenge for the energy-efficient and economically viable transformation of lignocellulosic materials. The varied tissue-specific distribution of cell wall components adds complexity to the origins of cell wall recalcitrance in grasses. This complex‐ ity usually led to empirically developed pretreatment processes to overcome recalcitrance. The tissue-specific distribution of lignin and hemicelluloses adds complexity to the origins of cell wall recalcitrance. Highly branched polymers are more resistant than less decorated polymers [2, 15] This behavior contrasts with cell wall recalcitrance derived from cellulose–hemicellulose interactions. This strong cellulose–hemicellulose interaction perhaps contributes to the increased recalcitrance observed in secondary cell walls

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call