Abstract

Creating new therapies often involves drug companies paying healthcare professionals and institutions for research and development (R&D) activities, including clinical trials. However, industry sponsorship can create conflicts of interest (COIs). We analysed approaches to drug company R&D payment disclosure in European countries and the distribution of R&D payments at the country and company level. Using documentary sources and a stakeholder survey we identified country- regulatory approaches to R&D payment disclosure. We reviewed company-level descriptions of disclosure practices in the United Kingdom, a country with a major role in Europe's R&D. We obtained country-level R&D payment data from industry trade groups and public authorities and company-level data from eurosfordocs.eu, a publicly available payments database. We conducted content analysis and descriptive statistical analysis. In 32 of 37 studied countries, all R&D payments were reported without named recipients, following a self-regulatory approach developed by the industry. The methodological descriptions from 125 companies operating in the United Kingdom suggest that within the self-regulatory approach companies had much leeway in deciding what activities and payments were considered as R&D. In five countries, legislation mandated the disclosure of R&D payment recipients, but only in two were payments practically identifiable and analysable. In 17 countries with available data, R&D constituted 19%-82% of all payments reported, with self-regulation associated with higher shares. Available company-level data from three countries with self-regulation suggests that R&D payments were concentrated by big funders, and some companies reported all, or nearly all, payments as R&D. The lack of full disclosure of R&D payments in countries with industry self-regulation leaves considerable sums of money unaccounted for and potentially many COIs undetected. Disclosure mandated by legislation exists in few countries and rarely enhances transparency practically. We recommend a unified European approach to R&D payment disclosure, including clear definitions and a centralised database.

Highlights

  • Mental Health Europe (MHE)[1] is concerned about the influence the pharmaceutical industry (Pharma) has over healthcare actors including healthcare professionals and organisations (HCPs and HCOs), families, patients, service providers and the general public

  • MHE believes that this influence has contributed to overreliance on the purely biomedical model as well as over-medicalisation in the field of mental health

  • This influence is deeply ingrained in the relationships, which are too often financial, between the pharma industry and mental health professionals and organisations and can impact on their independence, leading to unethical and biased decision-making in mental healthcare

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Mental Health Europe (MHE)[1] is concerned about the influence the pharmaceutical industry (Pharma) has over healthcare actors including healthcare professionals and organisations (HCPs and HCOs), families, patients, service providers and the general public. MHE believes that this influence has contributed to overreliance on the purely biomedical model as well as over-medicalisation in the field of mental health This influence is deeply ingrained in the relationships, which are too often financial, between the pharma industry and mental health professionals and organisations and can impact on their independence, leading to unethical and biased decision-making in mental healthcare. For this reason, since its inception, MHE has always had a firm position on never accepting funding of any kind from Pharma. There have been attempts at better self-regulation from Pharma and the healthcare profession including through the adoption of voluntary Disclosure Codes which have been transposed by industry and HCOs across Europe but it should be noted that these codes are not legally binding

At European level
European States with Sunshine Regulations
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call