Abstract

In tinnitus literature, researchers have increasingly been advocating for a clearer distinction between tinnitus perception and tinnitus-related distress. In non-bothersome tinnitus, the perception itself can be more specifically investigated: this has provided a body of evidence, based on resting-state and activation fMRI protocols, highlighting the involvement of regions outside the conventional auditory areas, such as the right parietal operculum. Here, we aim to conduct a review of available investigations of the human parietal operculo–insular subregions conducted at the microscopic, mesoscopic, and macroscopic scales arguing in favor of an auditory–somatosensory cross-talk. Both the previous literature and new results on functional connectivity derived from cortico–cortical evoked potentials show that these subregions present a dense tissue of interconnections and a strong connectivity with auditory and somatosensory areas in the healthy brain. Disrupted integration processes between these modalities may thus result in erroneous perceptions, such as tinnitus. More precisely, we highlight the role of a subregion of the right parietal operculum, known as OP3 according to the Jülich atlas, in the integration of auditory and somatosensory representation of the orofacial muscles in the healthy population. We further discuss how a dysfunction of these muscles could induce hyperactivity in the OP3. The evidence of direct electrical stimulation of this area eliciting auditory hallucinations further suggests its involvement in tinnitus perception. Finally, a small number of neuroimaging studies of therapeutic interventions for tinnitus provide additional evidence of right parietal operculum involvement.

Highlights

  • Tinnitus, the chronic perception of a phantom sound, is a public health issue estimated to have up to a 15% prevalence in the adult population [1,2] with 1% to 2% of the population suffering from unremitting tinnitus [3].A recent international multidisciplinary group proposes to distinguish between tinnitus and tinnitus disorders where tinnitus describes “the conscious awareness of a tonal or composite noise for which there is no identifiable corresponding external acoustic source”, corresponding to the percept per se, leading to tinnitus disorders “when associated with emotional distress, cognitive dysfunction, and/or autonomic arousal, leading to behavioral changes and functional disability” [4]

  • Most tinnitus studies are prone to confounding biases related to the difficulty in disambiguating effects attributable to the presence of tinnitus perception per se from those related to comorbidities such as hearing loss, a reduced sound tolerance threshold, anxiety disorders, or an impaired quality of life often experienced by tinnitus sufferers

  • The present review indicates that the right parietal operculum could be considered as a new target for stimulation, but given its depth below the cortical surface, dedicated coils should be introduced in this case

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The chronic perception of a phantom sound, is a public health issue estimated to have up to a 15% prevalence in the adult population [1,2] with 1% to 2% of the population suffering from unremitting tinnitus [3]. Functional MRI studies in tinnitus participants with hearing loss revealed that hearing loss, rather than tinnitus, was responsible for the plasticity in the auditory cortex [12], and that tonotopic map reorganization in the auditory cortex was not a causal factor of tinnitus [13,14] These findings, alongside evidence of tinnitus existing without hearing loss altogether or existing despite cochlear nerve ablation, reignited the debate on the cortical representation of tinnitus. Further connectivity studies between non-bothersome tinnitus participants and controls evidenced the presence of a differential connectivity from the OpP and a frontal region posterior to the frontal eye field [21]. These authors used a strategy that bypassed the question of comorbidities completely, by studying healthy subjects perceiving transitory phantom sounds resembling tinnitus. Served in previous studies, with potential for new avenues for future treatments

Microscopic Scale
Mesoscopic Scale
Intracerebral Recordings of the Operculo–Insular Cortex
Perceptions Mapping in the Operculo–Insular Cortex Induced by DES
Operculo–Insular Connectivity
Intracortical
Macroscopic
Integration
Integration of Auditory and Somatosensory Stimuli in the Operculo–Insular
Functional and Structural Connectivity of the Parietal Operculum and Insular Cortex
Encoding of Tinnitus in the Parietal Operculo–Insular Cortex
Functional and Structural Connectivity with the Parietal Operculum in Tinnitus
Perspectives for Treatment of Tinnitus
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call