Abstract
The purpose of establishing the RKUHP is in line with the spirit of decolonization and particularization so that it incorporates elements of law that live in society as basic provisions for prosecution in norms considered as a hallmark of the codification of Indonesian criminal law. This renewal in the RKUHP leaves crucial issues, one of which is by incorporating elements of law that live in society (The Living Law) and make laws that live in society as the basis for determining whether someone can be convicted or the basis for prosecution. This study uses a normative juridical method with a descriptive analytical approach. The inclusion of the law that lives in society into Article 2 of the RKUHP shows that there has been a conflict with the principle of legality which is the main principle of Indonesian criminal law as stipulated in Article 1 of the RKUHP which has implications for legal certainty
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
