Abstract
This paper examines the benefits of changing the payment system from SPMA (Academic Quality Improvement Contribution) to UKT (Single Money). On the one hand, the government considers that the UKT system provides great benefits because it is able to provide access to higher education for the general public who are less well off. On the other hand, students considered that the UKT system was not as good as theorized because it did not provide significant benefits. With a legal approach to UKT regulation, it is analyzed with Jeremy Bentham's theory of utilitarianism by using UKT implementation data in several PTKIN. As a result, the UKT system has benefits for the community. By using the instrument of the principle of utilitarianism, namely the greatest happiness, the data in the field shows that the implementation of UKT provides benefits to students.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
