Abstract
Inter-Time Change (PAW) in the context of Indonesian democracy is often in the spotlight in political dynamics. This research uses normative legal methods with a statutory approach to analyze the legal and political aspects of PAW. The aim of this research is to examine the implications of PAW in the representative democracy system in Indonesia as well as the relationship between council members and political parties. The research results show that PAW is often used as a control tool by political parties over council members who are not in line with party policies. In conclusion, PAW has a strong legal basis but needs a more transparent mechanism so as not to shift the direction of people's representatives to become representatives of the interests of political parties.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Civil Officium: Journal of Empirical Studies on Social Science
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
