Abstract
The existence of hoaxes in Indonesia has been around for a long time. However, the term hoax was widespread and became part of daily conversations in the media and the public during the 2014 and 2019 Presidential Election. The rapid development of social media use and the ease of information exchange accelerated the spread of hoax. Even in the COVID-19 pandemic, hoax news about the corona virus and matters related to it are widespread in the community. This hoax news, both during the Election and the Covid-19 Outbreak, caused much unrest in the community. Some of the hoax news spreaders were jailed for violations of the ITE Law. Various legal practitioners and academics have also suggested that hoax news creators and spreaders be criminalized. This article reviews normatively whether the criminalization of hoax news is feasible for reasons of maintaining stability or needs to be eliminated to maintain freedom of opinion. The author reviews the normative aspects of criminalizing the creation and dissemination of hoax news by using Habermas' theory of deliberative democracy. Through this theory, the writer finds that hoax news makes aspects of democracy such as dialogue that is full of awareness and accurate information unattainable. This is also in line with what the Indonesian constitution wants. However, it is necessary to ensure that the criminalization of hoaxes is not used as an instrument of abuse of power considering that the circulation of hoaxes is a symptom of a problem rather than the root of the problem itself.Keywords: Fake News, Criminalization, Stability, Freedom of Speech, Deliberative Democracy, Legal Revuew
Highlights
The existence of hoaxes in Indonesia has been around for a long time
12 Mompang L Panggabean, “Handling of Hoax News According to Law Number 1 of 1946,” International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology 29, no. 08 (2020): 1275–1287
“Handling of Hoax News According to Law Number 1 of 1946.”
Summary
Indonesia hingga tahun 2020 telah melakukan pemilihan umum untuk memilih Presiden Indonesia sebanyak 4 kali. Salah satu dampak negatif perubahan model distribusi informasi ini adalah persebaran hoaks atau berita palsu semakin luas dan cepat melalui internet dan media sosial. Hal ini dilakukan untuk memengaruhi opini publik dengan mengupayakan manipulasi agar informasi yang lebih banyak beredar dan dibicarakan di media sosial sesuai dengan kerangka yang hendak dibangun oleh kubu politik tersebut. Beberapa pihak lain juga menilai bahwa kriminalisasi terhadap berita hoaks ini bisa dijadikan sebagai bentuk penyalahgunaan kekuasaan untuk membungkam terhadap pihak yang berlawanan. Tinjauan ini dilakukan untuk melihat (1) bagaimana praktik kriminalisasi terhadap pelaku penyebaran hoaks berjalan, (2) apakah postur regulasi yang ada mampu memberikan ruang untuk penyalahgunaan kekuasaan, dan (3) bagaimana sebaiknya agar regulasi tentang penyebaran hoaks bisa tetap menjaga kualitas demokrasi. Penelitian ini akan memperluas variasi tinjauan hukum terhadap penyebaran berita hoaks dengan lebih mempertimbangkan faktor-faktor lain yang membuatnya lebih multidimensional
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
