Abstract

This paper studies how the timing assumption matters for the commitment problem and time inconsistency issue in search models with unemployment insurance. We analyze the Markov equilibrium without commitment and the Ramsey policy with commitment under two different timing assumptions. In the first timing, consumption takes place before search within each period; in the second, search takes place before consumption. Time inconsistency occurs mainly through search disincentive under the first timing, but only indirectly under the second timing. We show theoretically and numerically that the magnitude of time inconsistency is stronger under the first timing. • The timing assumption matters for the time inconsistency issue in search models. • A government’s commitment problem is analyzed under two different timings. • Time inconsistency is stronger when consumption takes place before search.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.