Abstract
Temporal preparation has been investigated extensively by manipulating the foreperiod, the interval between a warning stimulus and target stimulus requiring a speeded response. Although such research has revealed many effects of both the duration and distribution of foreperiods on reaction times, the underlying cognitive mechanism is still largely unknown. Here, we test a recent proposal that temporal preparation is driven by the retrieval of memory traces of past experiences from long-term memory rather than by knowledge about upcoming events. Two groups of participants received different foreperiod distributions in an acquisition phase, which was followed a week later by a transfer phase, in which both groups received the same distribution of foreperiods. We found that the effects of the different foreperiod distributions presented in the acquisition phase were still apparent a week later during the transfer phase, as the reaction time patterns of both groups reflected the old distributions. This occurred even though both groups were provided with full information about the change in the distribution of foreperiods at the start of the transfer phase. These findings provide compelling evidence that long-term memory plays an important role in temporal preparation.
Highlights
Temporal preparation has been investigated extensively by manipulating the foreperiod, the interval between a warning stimulus and target stimulus requiring a speeded response
They elaborated this view in a new multiple trace theory of temporal preparation (MTP), which is based on the following assumptions
Consistent with earlier findings by Los et al (2017), the effects of the different foreperiod distributions presented in Session 1 were still apparent in Session 2, where both groups received the same uniform distribution and were provided full information about the change in foreperiod distribution
Summary
Temporal preparation has been investigated extensively by manipulating the foreperiod, the interval between a warning stimulus and target stimulus requiring a speeded response. Starting from an alternative point of view, Los, Kruijne, and Meeter (2014) recently proposed that temporal preparation on the current trial is directly driven by representations of previous experiences stored in long-term memory (see Howard & Eichenbaum, 2013; Taatgen & Van Rijn, 2011). They elaborated this view in a new multiple trace theory of temporal preparation (MTP), which is based on the following assumptions. By adding the assumption that recent memory traces contribute more strongly to current preparation than older ones, MTP provides a natural explanation for typical short-term effects of foreperiod (i.e., the asymmetric sequential effect; e.g., Los, 2010; Steinborn & Langner, 2012; Zahn, Rosenthal, & Shakow, 1963), which have been problematic for hazard-based explanations
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.