Abstract

In research and practice, public transportation planning is executed in a series of steps, which are often divided into the strategic, the tactical, and the operational planning phase. Timetables are normally designed in the tactical phase, taking into account a given line plan, safety restrictions arising from infrastructural constraints, as well as regularity requirements and bounds on transfer times. In this paper, however, we propose a timetabling approach that is aimed at decision making in the strategic phase of public transportation planning and to determine an outline of a timetable that is good from the passengers’ perspective. Instead of including explicit synchronization constraints between train runs (as most timetabling models do), we include the adaption time (waiting time at the origin station) in the objective function to ensure regular connections between passengers’ origins and destinations. We model the problem as a mixed integer quadratic program and linearise it. Furthermore we propose a heuristic to generate starting solutions. We illustrate the type of solutions found by our approach on two case studies based on the Dutch railway network and analyse trade-offs that are made to balance dwell times and regularity of trains.

Highlights

  • The public transportation planning process is traditionally subdivided into a number of steps which are assigned to either the strategic, the tactical, or the operational planning phase

  • We propose a timetabling approach that is aimed at decision making in the strategic phase of public transportation planning and to determine an outline of a timetable that is good from the passengers’ perspective

  • In this paper we introduce the Strategic Passenger Oriented Timetabling (SPOT) problem

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The public transportation planning process is traditionally subdivided into a number of steps which are assigned to either the strategic, the tactical, or the operational planning phase. According to Huisman et al (2005), the strategic phase encompasses a time horizon of two to ten years before implementation and includes infrastructure decisions and line planning. The timetabling problem is often allocated to the tactical phase (approximately one year before implementation). Timetabling in the tactical phase takes a given line plan, safety restrictions arising from infrastructural constraints, as well as regularity requirements and bounds on transfer times as input. This paper, focuses on strategic timetabling, i.e., the generating of a (preliminary) timetable already in the strategic planning phase. Strategic timetabling can be used to make strategic decisions with respect to timetables, like “What should the headway times be between consecutive trains at a station?” and “Where should good transfer connections between

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call