Abstract

It has been proved that quantum computing has advantages in query complexity, communication complexity and also other computing models. However, it is hard to prove strictly that quantum computing has advantage in the Turing machine models in time complexity. For example, we do not know how to prove that Shor’s algorithm is strictly better than any classical algorithm, since we do not know the lower bound of time complexity of the factoring problem in Turing machine. In this paper, we consider the time-space complexity and prove strictly that quantum computing has advantages compared to their classical counterparts. We prove: (1) a time-space upper bound for recognition of the languages \(L_{INT}(n)\) on two-way finite automata with quantum and classical states (2QCFA): \(TS=\mathbf{O}(n^{3/2}\log n)\), whereas a lower bound on probabilistic Turing machine is \(TS=\mathbf{\Omega }(n^2)\); (2) a time-space upper bound for recognition of the languages \(L_{NE}(n)\) on exact 2QCFA: \(TS=\mathbf{O}(n^{1.87} \log n)\), whereas a lower bound on probabilistic Turing machine is \(TS=\mathbf{\Omega }(n^2)\).

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.