Abstract

In the low frequency range, the reverberation of a room should be characterized by the decay time, which can be determined experimentally by various methods. In order to make accurate and precise measurements, the differences between these methods and their advantages should be known and quantified. In this work, the performance of four linear and four adaptive time–frequency impulse response analysis methods was evaluated with the aim to find the most accurate method for characterizing the decays of the room modes. The methods were compared using generated Prony test signals with known modal properties and measured room impulse responses were also examined. The decay time using the selected time–frequency impulse response method was then estimated in three rooms and the measurement results were compared with interrupted sine tone methods. It has been shown that the choice of measurement setup and analysis parameters has an important influence on the estimation of the decay time and its modal frequency. The time–frequency impulse response method using the window width optimized Stockwell transform, the continuous wavelet transform, or the Morlet wave method were found to be the most robust methods, and their applicability is also enhanced by the fact that only a single measurement is required for the selected microphone position. The presented test methods could be used to evaluate the performance of other approaches for the evaluation of reverberation below the Schroeder frequency or the ability of measurement and signal processing techniques to characterize low frequency transient signals.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call