Abstract

Black-blood thrombus imaging (BTI) has shown to be advantageous for the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis (DVT). However, previous techniques using fast spin echo have a high specific absorption rate. As DANTE (delay alternating with nutation for tailored excitation) black-blood preparation can suppress blood flows over a broad range of velocities, we hypothesized that a DANTE black-blood preparation combined with a fast low-angle shot (FLASH) gradient-echo readout-DANTE-FLASH could be used to diagnose DVT. Eleven healthy volunteers and 30 suspected DVT patients were recruited to undergo DANTE-FLASH and magnetic resonance direct thrombus imaging (MRDTI). The suspected DVT patients were also examined by ultrasound (US). For the segment level, a total of 1,066 venous vessel segments were analyzed. Using US and MRDTI as the references, the sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV), and accuracy (ACC) of DANTE-FLASH were calculated. To quantitatively compare image quality between DANTE-FLASH and MRDTI, image signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), apparent contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) between muscle and the venous lumen, and the apparent CNR between the thrombus and venous lumen were measured. Additionally, diagnostic confidence, image quality, and clot burden were also evaluated. Using the consensus results of US and MRDTI as a standard reference, the diagnostic SE, SP, PPV, NPV, and ACC of DANTE-FLASH for the 2 readers were 97.0% and 93.2%, 99.0% and 98.2%, 93.4% and 87.9%, 99.6% and 99.0%, and 98.8% and 97.6%, respectively. According to the image quantitative analysis results, DANTE-FLASH demonstrated higher image SNR and CNR than MRDTI. The image quality and diagnostic confidence scores of DANTE-FLASH were higher than MRDTI (3.66±0.44 vs. 3.52±0.52, P<0.001, and 3.84±0.36 vs. 3.76±0.41, P<0.001). There was excellent agreement between DANTE-FLASH and MRDTI on clot burden evaluation. DANTE-FLASH provided better image quality than MRDTI and accurately detected thrombi. It may, therefore, serve as a safe and convenient alternative for the diagnosis of DVT.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call