Abstract

Temporal information about food availability can be easily entrained, as in the case of fixed feeding routines of captive animals. A sudden unintentional or deliberate delay (e.g., food deprivation—FD) leads to frustration and psychological stress due to the loss of temporal predictability. How marmosets—an increasingly used small primate—process and respond to FD stress has not been previously assessed. Here we delayed the routine feeding of adult captive marmosets for 3 or 6 h. Blood cortisol concentration was used as a hormonal measure of the stress response. Changes in the left/right baseline tympanic membrane temperature (TMT) were used as an indirect ipsilateral indicator of hemisphere activity. Marmosets that were deprived for 3 h had higher cortisol levels than non-deprived controls. Cortisol concentration in the marmosets deprived for 6 h did not differ from controls possibly due to adaptative mechanisms against the detrimental effects of prolonged high cortisol levels. Interestingly, FD stress may have been processed more symmetrically at first, as indicated by the bilateral increase in TMT at the 3 h interval. As the event progressed (i.e., 6 h), a clear rightward TMT bias suggests that hemisphere activity had become asymmetrical. Therefore, the sudden loss of temporal predictability of an entrained routine feeding schedule induces time-dependent changes in the cortisol stress response and shifts in the TMT (and potentially hemisphere activity) lateralization bias of adult captive marmosets.

Highlights

  • Feeding behavior can be influenced by experience-dependent learning processes related to the food item per se and its potential rewarding properties, along with its spatial and/or temporal availability (Webb et al, 2009)

  • Deliberate or unintentional delays in feeding schedules activate the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis and negatively affects the behavior of several species. This seems to be the case for nonhuman primates (NHP), including a rise in cortisol levels, attention so far has been mainly on how they respond to a specific delay (Lado-Abeal et al, 2000; Waitt and Buchanan-Smith, 2001; see Lyons et al, 2000; Medhamurthy et al, 2007)

  • We hypothesized that food deprivation (FD) stress would alter the marmosets’ right TMT and hemisphere activity, yet did not predict the direction of the TMT shift, as this has been shown to increase and decrease in response to stress in this species (Pereira et al, 2018, 2019)

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Feeding behavior can be influenced by experience-dependent learning processes related to the food item per se and its potential rewarding properties, along with its spatial and/or temporal availability (Webb et al, 2009). Deliberate or unintentional delays in feeding schedules activate the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis and negatively affects the behavior of several species (chickens: Beuving et al, 1989; calves: Johannesson and Ladewig, 2000; sheep: Yayou et al, 2009; Normando et al, 2013; horses: Zupan et al, 2020) This seems to be the case for nonhuman primates (NHP), including a rise in cortisol levels, attention so far has been mainly on how they respond to a specific (usually brief) delay (Lado-Abeal et al, 2000; Waitt and Buchanan-Smith, 2001; see Lyons et al, 2000; Medhamurthy et al, 2007). We hypothesized that FD stress would alter the marmosets’ right TMT and hemisphere activity, yet did not predict the direction of the TMT shift, as this has been shown to increase and decrease in response to stress in this species (Pereira et al, 2018, 2019)

Ethics Statement
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
ETHICS STATEMENT
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call