Abstract
We determined the precise time windows of the electromyographic (EMG) response components triggered by ankle motion and by body sway above the ankle. A support surface under the feet of healthy young adult participants in the quiet stance was moved in translation. The EMG response component triggered by body displacement above the ankle began at 95–100 ms and ended 145–155 ms after the onset of the support surface translation. The EMG response triggered by ankle dorsiflexion began at 35–50 ms and ended 110–115 ms after the onset of the translation in the soleus muscle, indicating that the response component began at a time similar to the short-latency response. In contrast, the response component in the gastrocnemius muscle began noticeably after that. The EMG response triggered by ankle dorsiflexion began at 75–85 ms and ended 125–135 ms after the onset of the translation in the gastrocnemius muscle. Our findings indicate that the threshold of the early response component to the somatic sensation of the ankle motion in the soleus muscle is lower than that in the gastrocnemius muscle. The response component triggered by the ankle motion continued long after the end of ankle dorsiflexion, indicating that the early component is mediated not only by the monosynaptic stretch reflex pathway but also by the polysynaptic pathway.
Highlights
Several studies have investigated the electromyographic (EMG) response components triggered by somatic sensations from particular body parts [1,2,3]
Our findings indicate that the threshold of the early response component to the somatic sensation of the ankle motion in the soleus muscle is lower than that in the gastrocnemius muscle
We determined the time window of the EMG response component in the gastrocnemius and soleus muscles triggered by the ankle motion and the response component triggered by the body sway above the ankle during a backward translation of the platform
Summary
Several studies have investigated the electromyographic (EMG) response components triggered by somatic sensations from particular body parts [1,2,3]. One weakness was that the precise time windows of the EMG response components triggered by the ankle motion and triggered by the body sway above the ankle were not elucidated. Another weakness was that slight ankle motion was still present in the nulled ankle input task, in which the ankle motion to the postural perturbation was minimal due to the simultaneous provision of backward translation and the toe-down tilt of the support surface. The time window of the EMG response component triggered by the somatic sensation derived from a particular body part is still a matter of investigation
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.