Time to Retire: The 4% Withdrawal Rule

Abstract

The so-called “<i>4% rule</i>” is perhaps the single most commonly referenced retirement withdrawal approach. Most discussion of this rule centers on the appropriate percentage to use, 4%, 3%, or 5%. My objective is to suggest a superior retirement rule. Superior in the sense that it will deliver a higher standard of living during one’s retirement years. I start with the observation that past retirement withdrawal analysis suffers from two key deficiencies, that is, a reliance on past US stock and bond market returns (ex-post cherry picking the best performing market) and an assumption that asset class returns can be modeled with independent and identically distributed random variables, serving to mask their important time series properties. This article repairs these two deficiencies. A new retirement distribution rule is proposed. One that distributes/liquidates an ever-increasing proportion of the retiree’s then-current portfolio as they age, but subject to a minimum monthly distribution expressed in dollar terms. This approach provides simplicity, ease of execution, and transparency. It also results in a standard of living for the retiree as expressed by the median and average monthly distributions that are 101.3% and 174.2%, respectively, above those delivered by the best possible constant-dollar withdrawal rule. This pleasing result occurs for two primary reasons. First, this new rule realizes significant benefit from selling more/less shares when markets are high/low (which is the exact opposite of what transpires with all constant-dollar rules). Or to use other words, it delivers a measurably higher IRR despite utilizing an identical asset mix. Second, the new rule effectively consumes the retiree’s entire portfolio over the retirement life, leaving no unused residual balance (again, the exact opposite of all constant-dollar rules).