Abstract

We give the first nontrivial model-independent time–space tradeoffs for satisfiability. Namely, we show that SAT cannot be solved in n1+o(1) time and n1−ε space for any ε>0 general random-access nondeterministic Turing machines. In particular, SAT cannot be solved deterministically by a Turing machine using quasilinear time and n space. We also give lower bounds for log-space uniform NC1 circuits and branching programs. Our proof uses two basic ideas. First we show that if SAT can be solved nondeterministically with a small amount of time then we can collapse a nonconstant number of levels of the polynomial-time hierarchy. We combine this work with a result of Nepomnjaščiı that shows that a nondeterministic computation of superlinear time and sublinear space can be simulated in alternating linear time. A simple diagonalization yields our main result. We discuss how these bounds lead to a new approach to separating the complexity classes NL and NP. We give some possibilities and limitations of this approach.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call