Abstract

The relevance of exact spike timings in neural coding was presumed since a long time and has now been experimentally established, see e.g. in [1,2]. A popular approach to the analysis of spike timings is to measure the synchrony of spike trains. With the recent advancements of the experimental techniques, it is now possible to simultaneously record the activity of hundreds of neurons. The analysis of such collective responses requires new mathematical tools that are able to detect synchrony in groups of spike trains. Here, we present three methods to quantify spike train synchrony that are applicable in such multivariate situations. All of these methods are parameter-free and time-resolved which makes them easy to handle and able to detect temporal changes of synchrony. Specifically, we discuss the ISI-distance [3], the SPIKE-distance [4] and the very recently proposed SPIKE-Synchronization [5]. The ISI-distance is based on the relative differences of interspike intervals, while the SPIKE-distance uses exact spike timings. SPIKE-Synchronization can be understood as a time-resolved, spike-wise coincidence detector. Figure ​Figure11 shows exemplarily the time-resolved profiles of all three methods for 50 artificially created spike trains. Figure 1 Multivariate ISI, SPIKE and SPIKE-Synchronization profiles for 50 artificially generated spike trains. The dashed lines represent the respective expectation values for random Poisson spike trains. We analyze the mathematical properties of all three measures and discuss their advantages and disadvantages [6]. Specific focus lies on the statistical relevance of the obtained values compared to random spike trains. By calculating the expectation values for Poisson spike trains we are able to provide an important point of reference for interpreting numerical and experimental results. Finally, we show exemplary applications of the methods to spike trains obtained from numerical simulations [7] as well as experimental recordings [4]. The methods are implemented in both the Matlab-based graphical user interface SPIKY [5] and the Python library PySpike.

Highlights

  • The relevance of exact spike timings in neural coding was presumed since a long time and has been experimentally established, see e.g. in [1,2]

  • The ISI-distance is based on the relative differences of interspike intervals, while the SPIKEdistance uses exact spike timings

  • SPIKE-Synchronization can be understood as a time-resolved, spike-wise coincidence detector

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The relevance of exact spike timings in neural coding was presumed since a long time and has been experimentally established, see e.g. in [1,2]. We discuss the ISI-distance [3], the SPIKEdistance [4] and the very recently proposed SPIKE-Synchronization [5].

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.