Abstract

Under sleep loss, vigilance is reduced and attentional failures emerge progressively. It becomes difficult to maintain stable performance over time, leading to growing performance variability (i.e., state instability) in an individual and among subjects. Task duration plays a major role in the maintenance of stable vigilance levels, such that the longer the task, the more likely state instability will be observed. Vulnerability to sleep-loss-dependent performance decrements is highly individual and is also modulated by a polymorphism in the human clock gene PERIOD3 (PER3). By combining two different protocols, we manipulated sleep-wake history by once extending wakefulness for 40 h (high sleep pressure condition) and once by imposing a short sleep-wake cycle by alternating 160 min of wakefulness and 80 min naps (low sleep pressure condition) in a within-subject design. We observed that homozygous carriers of the long repeat allele of PER3 (PER35/5) experienced a greater time-on-task dependent performance decrement (i.e., a steeper increase in the number of lapses) in the Psychomotor Vigilance Task compared to the carriers of the short repeat allele (PER34/4). These genotype-dependent effects disappeared under low sleep pressure conditions, and neither motivation, nor perceived effort accounted for these differences. Our data thus suggest that greater sleep-loss related attentional vulnerability based on the PER3 polymorphism is mirrored by a greater state instability under extended wakefulness in the short compared to the long allele carriers. Our results undermine the importance of time-on-task related aspects when investigating inter-individual differences in sleep loss-induced behavioral vulnerability.

Highlights

  • In modern 24/7 society, sleep loss is part of our daily lives, and many professions come along with night or shift work nowadays

  • Momentary task disengagement seems to be more pronounced in PER35/5than in PER34/4 carriers under SD—they suffered more from elevated sleep pressure conditions

  • By analysing the 10% fastest reaction times (RT), we showed that the time course of optimal performance levels did not differ in function of genotype, indicating that a temporary mobilization of effort is still possible for both vulnerable and more resilient participants

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In modern 24/7 society, sleep loss is part of our daily lives, and many professions come along with night or shift work nowadays. To understand how cognitive performance variation emerges, the two main oscillators involved in the regulation of sleep and wakefulness need to be considered (Borbely, 1982; Daan et al, 1984). A circadian process represents a nearly 24-h oscillation, promoting wakefulness and sleep at specific times of the day. The interplay of both processes leads to consolidated states of sleep and wakefulness and contributes to the modulation of cognitive performance over the 24 h light-dark cycle (Cajochen et al, 2004; Dijk and Von Schantz, 2005; Cajochen et al, 2010). Most detrimental effects emerge in the Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience www.frontiersin.org

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.