Abstract

Background Three-dimensional (3D) time-of-flight (TOF) MR angiography (MRA) at 7 T has been reported to have high image quality for visualizing small perforating vessels. However, B1 inhomogeneity and more physiologic considerations limit its applications. Angiography at 5 T may provide another choice for intracranial vascular imaging. Purpose To evaluate the image quality and cerebrovascular visualization of 5-T 3D TOF MRA for visualizing intracranial small branch arteries. Materials and Methods Participants (healthy volunteers or participants with a history of ischemic stroke undergoing intracranial CT angiography or MRA for identifying steno-occlusive disease) were prospectively included from September 2021 to November 2021. Each participant underwent 3-T, 5-T, and 7-T 3D TOF MRA with use of customized MR protocols within 48 hours. Radiologist scoring from 0 (invisible) to 3 (excellent) and quantitative assessment were obtained to evaluate the image quality. The Friedman test was used for comparison of characteristics derived from 3 T, 5 T, and 7 T. Results A total of 12 participants (mean age ± SD, 38 years ± 9; nine men) were included. Visualizations of the distal arteries and small vessels at 5-T TOF MRA were significantly higher than those at 3 T (median score: 3.0 vs 2.0, all P < .001 for distal segments and lenticulostriate artery; median score: 2.0 vs 0, P < .001 for pontine artery). The total length of small vessel branches detected at 5 T was larger than that at 3 T (5.1 m ± 0.7 vs 1.9 m ± 0.4; P < .001). However, there was no evidence of a significant difference compared with 7 T in either the depiction of distal segments and small vessel branches (average median score, 2.5; all P > .05) or the quantitative measurements (total length, 5.6 m ± 0.5; P = .41). Conclusion Three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography at 5 T presented the capability to provide superior visualization of distal large arteries and small vessel branches (in terms of subjective and quantitative assessment) to 3 T and had image quality similar to 7 T. © RSNA, 2022 Online supplemental material is available for this article. An earlier incorrect version appeared online. This article was corrected on September 14, 2022.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call