Abstract
Public child welfare workers in California reported their judgments of time limits and the timing of court reviews under permanency planning statutes. Overall, workers support California's 12-month limit on reunification services, although differences emerge between staff with more child welfare experience and between agencies with differing training for and experience with permanency planning. Recommendations for policy and practice are forwarded.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
