Abstract

Controversy surrounds the genetic relationship between gold mineralization and magmatism, especially in deposits in granite. Jiaodong Peninsula is the leading gold province in China, and most deposits are in Mesozoic granites; moreover, debate on the genesis persists. In eastern Jiaodong, the Muping–Rushan gold belt produces mainly quartz–sulfide vein-type gold, and the Upper Jurassic Kunyushan granite and Late Lower Cretaceous Sanfoshan granite are the wall rock. Precise mineralization ages should be identified to determine whether gold is related to the intrusion. In this study, three gold deposits (Sanjia, Yinggezhuang, and Xipo) from two ore-controlling faults were considered. Muscovites from quartz–sulfide veins and beresite were selected for Argon–Argon dating. The results obtained were 116.51 ± 0.47 Ma, 120.02 ± 0.38 Ma, and 121.65 ± 0.48 Ma for the three deposits, respectively. The mineralization lasted about 5 Ma in the Muping–Rushan gold belt. The test results showed that the mineralization was 16 Ma later than the intrusion time of Kunyushan granite and was earlier than that of Sanfoshan granite. Only the cooling age overlapped with the mineralization age. Previous studies have demonstrated that the ore fluid is of medium–low salinity and medium–low temperature. No typical high–low temperature mineral assemblage exists in the Muping–Rushan gold belt. Hence, gold deposits in Muping–Rushan gold belt could not be categorized as intrusion-related gold type.

Highlights

  • Jiaodong peninsula is a well-known gold province with 5000 t of proven gold resources in China [1,2,3]

  • Geochronology studies in the Muping–Rushan gold belt have reported a wide range of results [15,24,25,26,27,28,29,30]; the dating method and samples used must be considered to determine the relationship beof 15 tween mineralization and magmatism

  • Muscovites from three gold deposits in the Muping–Rushan gold belt dating can be ignored, the 40 Ar–39 Ar ages of muscovite can accurately show the time limit were selected for the Argon–Argon (Ar–Ar) dating to determine the mineralization age

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Jiaodong peninsula is a well-known gold province with 5000 t of proven gold resources in China [1,2,3]. Geochronology studies in the Muping–Rushan gold belt have reported a wide range of results [15,24,25,26,27,28,29,30]; the dating method and samples used must be considered to determine the relationship beof 15 tween mineralization and magmatism. As the influence of thermal disturbance on 40 Ar–39 Ar. In this study, muscovites from three gold deposits in the Muping–Rushan gold belt dating can be ignored, the 40 Ar–39 Ar ages of muscovite can accurately show the time limit were selected for the Argon–Argon (Ar–Ar) dating to determine the mineralization age. A deeper understanding of the metallogenic background in the Eastern Jiaodong Peninsula

Regional Geological Setting
The main o
Sampling and Analytical
Ar–Ar Dating Results
40 Ar–39 Ar
Relationship between Mineralization and Magmatism
Orogenic Gold Deposit in the Muping–Rushan Gold Belt
Findings
Summary
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call