Abstract
Much of spatial economic theory is based on general economic equilibrium theory, although there are problems in a direct addition of a spatial dimension. The most striking is the lack of an analysis of the role of non-material and material public capital (or infrastructure) in the deduction of a static equilibrium structure or patterns of growth and development of economies. In this paper I demonstrate how different aspects of time can improve our understanding of dynamics of economies.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
