Abstract

As individual sexual behavior is variable over time, the timing of interventions might be vital to reducing HIV transmission. We aimed to investigate transitions between HIV risk levels among men who have sex with men (MSM), and identify determinants associated with behavior change. Participants in a longitudinal cohort study among HIV-negative MSM (Amsterdam Cohort Studies) completed questionnaires about their sexual behavior during biannual visits (2008–2017). Visits were assigned to different HIV risk levels, based on latent classes of behavior. We modelled transitions between risk levels, and identified determinants associated with these transitions at the visit preceding the transition using multi-state Markov models. Based on 7,865 visits of 767 participants, we classified three risk levels: low (73% of visits), medium (22%), and high risk (5%). For MSM at low risk, the six-month probability of increasing risk was 0.11. For MSM at medium risk, the probability of increasing to high risk was 0.08, while the probability of decreasing to low risk was 0.33. For MSM at high risk, the probability of decreasing risk was 0.43. Chemsex, erection stimulants and poppers, high HIV risk perception, and recent STI diagnosis were associated with increased risk at the next visit. High HIV risk perception and young age were associated with decreasing risk. Although the majority of MSM showed no behavior change, a considerable proportion increased HIV risk. Determinants associated with behavior change may help to identify MSM who are likely to increase risk in the near future and target interventions at these individuals, thereby reducing HIV transmission.

Highlights

  • Timing of preventive interventions is essential to reduce transmission of infectious diseases, and is important for pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use to reduce HIV transmission

  • We aimed to identify determinants of imminent changes in sexual behavior that go beyond the PrEP eligibility criteria, and of increasing and decreasing HIV risk

  • 767 Men who have sex with men (MSM) with 7,865 visits were included in this study (88% of all HIV-negative Amsterdam Cohort Studies (ACS) visits), with a median number of 10 visits (IQR = 6–15) per participant (S1 Table)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Timing of preventive interventions is essential to reduce transmission of infectious diseases, and is important for pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use to reduce HIV transmission. Several preventive interventions have been found effective in reducing HIV transmission, including condom use, regular testing, and treatment with antiretroviral therapy (ART) as prevention (e.g., Undetectable = Untransmittable (U = U)) [4, 5]. These interventions have likely contributed to the decrease in number of diagnoses in the Netherlands observed since 2008 [3]. Despite the implementation of these interventions, HIV transmission among MSM continues, and PrEP use may further reduce HIV transmission

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call