Time for a new paradigm shift from STE/non-STEMI to ACO/non-ACOMI?

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Although ST-segment elevation (STE) has been used synonymously with acute coronary occlusion (ACO), current STE criteria miss nearly one-third of ACO and cause a substantial amount of false catheterization laboratory activations. Purpose We sought whether a new ACO/non-ACO myocardial infarction (MI) paradigm would result in better identification of the patients who need acute reperfusion therapy. Methods A total of 3000 patients were enrolled in STEMI, non-STEMI and control groups. A combined ACO endpoint was composed of peak troponin level, troponin rise within the first 24 hours and angiographic appearance. Results In non-STEMI group, 282 patients were re-classified as having ACO. This subgroup had a higher ACO frequency and myocardial damage compared to NSTEMI group. More importantly, in-hospital and long-term mortality rates was similar to STEMI patients. The ECG reviewers prospectively classified 35.6% of ECGs as STEMI and 35.5% of ECGs as ACOMI; 25.6% being shared in the both definitions. Both unweighted and weighted diagnostic accuracy of STEMI/non-STEMI and ACOMI/non-ACOMI approaches for ACO and long-term mortality were presented in Table 1. The diagnostic accuracy of the ACOMI/non-ACOMI approach was superior to the STEMI/non-STEMI approach in three out of four comparisons. We also sought to compare ECG subtypes according to early (ECG-to-PCI time<120 min) and late (ECG-to-PCI time over 120 min) coronary intervention (Figure 1). Conclusions We believe that it is time for a new paradigm shift from the STEMI/non-STEMI to the ACOMI/non-ACOMI in the acute management of MI. Figure 1 Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None