Abstract

IntroductionThe automated quantitative antigen test (QAT), which detects severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), is suitable for mass screening. However, its diagnostic capability differentiated by time from onset and potential contribution to infectivity assessment have not been fully investigated. MethodsA retrospective, observational study using nasopharyngeal swab specimens from coronavirus disease (COVID-19) inpatients was conducted using LumipulseⓇ SARS-CoV-2 antigen test. Diagnostic accuracy was examined for the early (up to 10 days after onset) and late (over 10 days after onset) stages. Time-course QAT changes and reverse‐transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction tests results were displayed as locally estimated scatterplot smoothing curve, and receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis was used to determine the appropriate cutoff value for differentiating the early and late stages. ResultsWe obtained 100 specimens from 68 COVID-19 patients, including 51 early-stage and 49 late-stage specimens. QAT sensitivity and specificity were 0.82 (0.72–0.90) and 0.95 (0.75–0.99) for all periods, 0.93 (0.82–0.98) and 1.00 (0.39–1.00) for the early stage, and 0.66 (0.48–0.82) and 0.93 (0.69–0.99) for the late stage, respectively. The ROC analysis indicated an ideal cutoff value of 6.93 pg/mL for distinguishing early-from late-stage specimens. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for predicting the late stage were 0.76 (0.61–0.87), 0.76 (0.63–0.87), 0.76 (0.61–0.87), and 0.76 (0.63–0.87). ConclusionsQAT has favorable diagnostic accuracy in the early COVID-19 stages. In addition, an appropriate cutoff point can potentially facilitate rapid identification of noncontagious patients.

Highlights

  • The automated quantitative antigen test (QAT), which detects severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), is suitable for mass screening

  • Some studies have implied that the rapid antigen test (RATs) is a potentially su­ perior predictor of positive viral culture results to reverse-transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) [6,7], implying that RAT may contribute to the identification of specimens with disease transmissibility

  • We aimed to investigate the following: (1) the chronological changes in QAT accuracy in the early and late stages of COVID-19 and (2) the potential contribution of QAT to the estimation of disease transmissibility

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The automated quantitative antigen test (QAT), which detects severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), is suitable for mass screening. Some studies have implied that the RAT is a potentially su­ perior predictor of positive viral culture results to RT-qPCR [6,7], implying that RAT may contribute to the identification of specimens with disease transmissibility. We aimed to investigate the following: (1) the chronological changes in QAT accuracy in the early and late stages of COVID-19 and (2) the potential contribution of QAT to the estimation of disease transmissibility.

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call