Abstract

A strong conjecture in literature is that momentum profits can be ascribed - at least in part - to the (inefficient) incorporation of new earnings information in the pricing of stocks. A similar hypothesis is set to explain the post-earnings announcement effect. So far empirical research on the momentum effect is strictly separated from empirical research on post-earnings announcement drift. A link between these two strands of literature is hindered by the different timing nature of earnings announcements - (which are events) while momentum strategies involve ranking and holding periods of 3-12 months. This barrier is lifted by proving that past-return strategies with an L-month ranking period can be interpreted as a convolution of L successive past-return strategies with a one-month ranking period. A focus on strategies with a one-month ranking period is sufficient to study momentum strategies. The focus on one-month strategies opens new perspectives to disentangle multiple sources contributing to momentum profits. The confinement to one-month strategies goes together with the possibility to study time calendar, fiscal year calendar and earnings-reporting calendar patterns in the momentum effect. Momentum profits are at a maximum when selecting winner and loser stocks in months with earnings announcements. About half of the momentum profits are related to post-earnings announcement drift. Apart from strong earnings calendar patterns we find strong time calendar patterns, perhaps due to portfolio rebalancing by fund managers at the end of the year.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call