Abstract
While clean intermittent catheterization (CIC) is the gold standard for bladder management after spinal cord injury (SCI), many individuals with SCI, for reasons not fully understood, choose alternative bladder management. We hypothesized that CIC is associated with an increased time burden in individuals with SCI. To investigate the time required to perform neurogenic bladder management in individuals with SCI. An electronic nonvalidated questionnaire was designed to determine the self-reported time spent performing bladder management. It was sent to participants in the Neurogenic Bladder Research Group SCI Registry, a national quality of life study of individuals with SCI. Eighty-seven individuals responded to the survey. CIC was the most common bladder management (76%). Men and women performing independent CIC had similar average times with each catheterization episode (8.8 vs. 8.5 minutes, p = .864) as did women with a catheterizable stoma compared to women catheterizing per urethra (8.2 minutes, p = .913). Longer catheterization times were associated with cervical spine injury (mean 12.4 minutes per catheterization) and women requiring caregiver assistance (mean 20 minutes per catheterization). In addition, obese/overweight women had longer CIC times than normal weight women (14.5 minutes vs. 7 minutes; p = .036), while catheterization time was similar for all men regardless of body mass index. Individuals with indwelling catheters spent less than a third of the time on bladder management per day compared to those doing CIC (17 vs. 53 minutes per day, p < .001). Management of neurogenic bladder after SCI, especially in those performing CIC, is time consuming. This time burden may play a role in long-term bladder management decisions.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.