Time between inhibitor detection and start of immune tolerance induction: Association with outcome in the BrazIT study

Abstract

BackgroundImmune tolerance induction (ITI) is the treatment of choice for eradication of anti‐factor VIII (FVIII) neutralizing alloantibodies (inhibitors) in people with inherited hemophilia A and high‐responding inhibitor (PwHA‐HRi). The association between ITI outcome and time elapsed between inhibitor detection and start of ITI (∆tinhi‐ITI) is debatable. ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate this association among a large cohort of severe PwHA‐HRi. MethodsSevere (factor VIII activity level <1%) PwHA‐HRi on ITI (n = 142) were enrolled in 15 hemophilia treatment centers. PwHA‐HRi were treated according to the Brazilian ITI Protocol. ITI outcomes were defined as success (i.e., recovered responsiveness to exogenous FVIII) and failure (i.e., no responsiveness to exogenous FVIII and requirement of bypassing agents to control bleeding). ResultsMedian ages at inhibitor detection and at ITI start were 3.2 years (interquartile range [IQR], 1.6–8.1) and 6.9 years [IQR, 2.6–20.1), respectively. PwHA‐HRi were stratified according to ∆tinhi‐ITI quartiles: first (0.0–0.6 year), second (>0.6–1.7 year), third (>1.7–9.2 years), and fourth quartile (>9.2–24.5 years). The overall success rate was 65.5% (93/142), with no difference among first, second, third, and fourth quartiles (62.9%, 69.4%, 58.3%, and 71.4%, respectively) even after adjusting the analyses for potential confounders. ConclusionIn conclusion, delayed ITI start is not associated with failure of ITI in PwHA‐HRi. Therefore, ITI should be offered for these patients, regardless of the time elapsed between the detection of inhibitor and the ITI start.