Abstract
Introduction. Compression therapy is the standard of care for the treatment of lower extremity edema. However, compression therapy systems can be time-consuming to apply, which adds costs to the health care system and further strains human resources. Objective. The purpose of this study was to assess time and labor costs associated with the application of a 2LB versus 4LB compression therapy system. Materials and Methods. Time and labor cost data associated with the application of a 2LB system for the treatment of lower extremity edema of all etiologies were collected from a single high-volume wound care center located in Dayton, Ohio. The time and labor costs were compared to a 4LB system over the course of a single day (n = 38). Results. The application time and associated costs were 50% lower for the 2LB system. The expected savings of a 2LB compression system over the course of a month was 16:27 hours and $427 compared to a 4LB compression system, and the revenue gain was estimated at $15 210 revenue per month over the course of the month for the practice. Conclusion. The use of a 2LB compression system may be associated with substantial time and cost savings compared to a 4LB system.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Wounds: a compendium of clinical research and practice
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.