Abstract
Abstract The effect of tillage and soil horizon on the performance of three soil water characteristic models (Hutson and Cass, van Genuchten, and Verma and Brusaert models) was investigated. The impact of field-scale heterogeneity on the estimated parameters of the models was also analysed. Variabilities in model parameters were found to be significant at 5% significance level. The model predictions were more reliable for conventional tillage treatment than for no tillage treatment. For both tillage treatments all the models performed equally well for the A horizon, while the van Genuchten model was the best choice for the B horizon. All the models accounted for over 97% of variability of soil water characteristics, yet no one model gave a best theoretical representation of soil water characteristics in both the A and B horizons over the entire field. Precision analyses on the van Genuchten parameters indicated that α gives more precise estimates of soil water characteristic than η in both the A and B horizons for no tillage and conventional tillage treatments.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.