Abstract

The increased use of pesticides and tillage intensification is known to negatively affect biodiversity. Changes in these agricultural practices such as herbicide and tillage reduction have variable effects among taxa, especially at the top of the trophic network including insectivorous bats. Very few studies compared the effects of agricultural practices on such taxa, and overall, only as a comparison of conventional versus organic farming without accurately accounting for underlying practices, especially in conventional where many alternatives exist. Divergent results founded in these previous studies could be driven by this lack of clarification about some unconsidered practices inside both conventional and organic systems. We simultaneously compared, over whole nights, bat activity on contiguous wheat fields of one organic and three conventional farming systems located in an intensive agricultural landscape. The studied organic fields (OT) used tillage (i.e., inversion of soil) without chemical inputs. In studied conventional fields, differences consisted of the following: tillage using few herbicides (T), conservation tillage (i.e., no inversion of soil) using few herbicides (CT), and conservation tillage using more herbicide (CTH), to control weeds. Using 64 recording sites (OT = 12; T = 21; CT = 13; CTH = 18), we sampled several sites per system placed inside the fields each night. We showed that bat activity was always higher in OT than in T systems for two (Pipistrellus kuhlii and Pipistrellus pipistrellus) of three species and for one (Pipistrellus spp.) of two genera, as well as greater species richness. The same results were found for the CT versus T system comparison. CTH system showed higher activity than T for only one genus (Pipistrellus spp.). We did not detect any differences between OT and CT systems, and CT showed higher activity than CTH system for only one species (Pipistrellus kuhlii). Activity in OT of Pipistrellus spp. was overall 3.6 and 9.3 times higher than CTH and T systems, respectively, and 6.9 times higher in CT than T systems. Our results highlight an important benefit of organic farming and contrasted effects in conventional farming. That there were no differences detected between the organic and one conventional system is a major result. This demonstrates that even if organic farming is presently difficult to implement and requires a change of economic context for farmers, considerable and easy improvements in conventional farming are attainable, while maintaining yields and approaching the ecological benefits of organic methods.

Highlights

  • Halting the loss of biodiversity, recognized as a crucial aim for humanity (Cardinale et al, 2012), has resulted in the adoption of different environmental policies to reduce the impact of anthropogenic changes

  • This study is the first to assess the effect of accurate farming practices on bats, comparing the effect of organic and a gradient of conventional systems in tillage and herbicide intensity

  • Our results highlight that the organic tillage system (OT) always had a significantly greater positive effect on bats than the tillage system (T, conventional farming)

Read more

Summary

| INTRODUCTION

Halting the loss of biodiversity, recognized as a crucial aim for humanity (Cardinale et al, 2012), has resulted in the adoption of different environmental policies to reduce the impact of anthropogenic changes. None appear satisfactory in large productive agricultural regions where landscapes have been heavily modified, where production has a strong economic stake, but where conservation of species and ecosystem functions and services are crucial (Power, 2010), especially as these systems cover large areas on a global scale (agriculture area: 38.5%; FAO, 2011) In such intensive regions, the best complementary and conciliatory approaches in the short term (i.e., without big changes in the political choices of production) are likely to be those that increase biodiversity potential (species, abundance) without reducing production and the surface of seminatural habitats, a so-c­ alled win-­no loss situation (Teillard, Doyen, Dross, Jiguet, & Tichit, 2016). We hypothesize that tillage and herbicide reductions in conventional systems could help to mitigate this gap, influencing availability of arthropod prey known to drive bat activity

| METHODS
Findings
| DISCUSSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call