Abstract
Traditionally, uniform and standardized IT-solutions in health care are considered mechanisms for increased control, efficiency and quality. Unfortunately, in spite of existing studies of the actual experiences of standardization, such as how they come into being, and how they are intertwined with local practice, unreasonable belief in standardization seems to prevail. Acknowledging the origin of standardization and its local character, however, does not mean that standardization is futile or should be avoided. It rather means that standardization efforts should balance the management level’s need for increased coordination and control, and the local level’s need for flexibility. The aim of this chapter is to strike this balance as it elaborates the implications and the “costs” for local practice in order to make a standard work. Empirically, the chapter draws on a standardization effort of discharge letter production in the University Hospital of Northern Norway.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
