Abstract

Extant literature distinguishes between two perspectives that make different assumptions about the effect of structure on firm performance: One emphasizes the value of tight interdependencies, the other advocates for loose interdependencies. We find that these literatures build on a common assumption that structure hinders organizational adaptation. Based on an in-depth case study of a software company with 30 years of successful history, we show how a combination of tight and loose coupling – a tightly coupled activity system aligned around loose discretion-inducing elements – can facilitate strategic renewal. We propose an integrative perspective that provides a more complete picture on how organizational structures affect adaptation. This perspective recognizes that organizational structures can enable individual and interpersonal behaviors that aggregate into a firm-level capacity for continuous renewal.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.