Abstract

<i>Context. <i/>2MASS J05352184-0546085 (2M0535-05) is the only known eclipsing brown dwarf (BD) binary, and so may serve as a benchmark for models of BD formation and evolution. However, theoretical predictions of the system's properties seem inconsistent with observations: i) the more massive (primary) component is observed to be cooler than the less massive (secondary) one; ii) the secondary is more luminous (by <i>≈<i/>10<sup>24<sup/> W) than expected. Previous explanations for the temperature reversal have invoked reduced convective efficiency in the structure of the primary, connected to magnetic activity and to surface spots, but these explanations cannot account for the enhanced luminosity of the secondary. Previous studies also considered the possibility that the secondary is younger than the primary.<i>Aims. <i/>We study the impact of tidal heating to the energy budget of both components to determine if it can account for the observed temperature reversal and the high luminosity of the secondary. We also compare various plausible tidal models to determine a range of predicted properties.<i>Methods. <i/>We apply two versions of two different, well-known models for tidal interaction, respectively: i) the “constant-phase-lag” model; and ii) the “constant-time-lag” model and incorporate the predicted tidal heating into a model of BD structure. The four models differ in their assumptions about the rotational behavior of the bodies, the system's eccentricity and putative misalignments <i>ψ<i/> between the bodies' equatorial planes and the orbital plane of the system.<i>Results. <i/> The contribution of heat from tides in 2M0535-05 alone may only be large enough to account for the discrepancies between observation and theory in an unlikely region of the parameter space. The tidal quality factor of BDs would have to be 10 and the secondary needs a spin-orbit misalignment of <i>≳<i/>. However, tidal synchronization time scales for 2M0535-05 restrict the tidal dissipation function to log() <i>≳<i/> 4.5 and rule out intense tidal heating in 2M0535-05. We provide the first constraint on <i>Q<i/> for BDs.<i>Conclusions. <i/>Tidal heating alone is unlikely to be responsible for the surprising temperature reversal within 2M0535-05. But an evolutionary embedment of tidal effects and a coupled treatment with the structural evolution of the BDs is necessary to corroborate or refute this result. The heating could have slowed down the BDs' shrinking and cooling processes after the birth of the system <i>≈<i/>1 Myr ago, leading to a feedback between tidal inflation and tidal heating. Observations of old BD binaries and measurements of the Rossiter-McLaughlin effect for 2M0535-05 can provide further constraints on .

Highlights

  • This system is observed to have an unexpected temperature reversal (Stassun et al 2006), contravening theoretical simulations: the more massive component is the cooler one

  • We study the impact of tidal heating to the energy budget of both components to determine if it can account for the observed temperature reversal and the high luminosity of the secondary

  • Tidal heating may account for the temperature reversal and it may have a profound effect on the longer-term thermal evolution of the system

Read more

Summary

Introduction

This system is observed to have an unexpected temperature reversal (Stassun et al 2006), contravening theoretical simulations: the more massive component (the primary) is the cooler one. The primary, predicted to have Teff,1 ≈ 2870 K (Baraffe et al 1998), has an observed value of ≈2700 K, whereas the surface temperature of the secondary, predicted to be Teff,2 ≈ 2750 K, is most compatible with Teff,2 ≈ 2890 K. One explanation for the temperature discrepancies is suppression of convection due to spots on the surface of the primary. If a portion of a BD’s surface is covered by spots, its apparent temperature will be reduced, resulting in an increase in the estimated radius in order for the measured and expected luminosities to agree (Chabrier et al 2007). Observations of spots on both of the 2M0535−05 components (Gómez Maqueo Chew et al 2009), as inferred from periodic variations in the light curve, and measurements on the Hα line of the combined spectrum during the radial velocity maxima (Reiners et al 2007)

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call