Abstract

In this paper, we demonstrate using a simple model that reducing tick size may either reduce or increase adverse selection. Therefore, the effect of tick size on adverse selection is an important empirical question. At the same time, we demonstrate that the standard asymmetric information models used to estimate effects of informed trading rely on econometric techniques that may give spurious results. Using simulations from an equilibrium model with no asymmetric information but endogenously determined market orders, we demonstrate that standard techniques may generate a positive asymmetric information component even when the true one is zero, and that this upward bias in the adverse selection component is affected by tick size. This bias occurs in part from serial correlation of order flow that may increase under sufficiently small tick sizes due to orders being split.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.