Ticagrelor versus Clopidogrel in diabetes patients afflicted with acute coronary syndrome stratified by renal function

Abstract

Abstract Background Ticagrelor has been recommended in place of clopidogrel as part of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in diabetic patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients also have a worse prognosis in the setting of ACS, but the safety and efficacy data for the use of P2Y12 inhibitors in moderate to severe CKD patients (eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73m2) are insufficient. Purpose There has been limited data on the outcome of prescribing ticagrelor compared to clopidogrel in ACS-DM patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Methods This prospective, nationwide, multi-center, observational study, the Acute Coronary Syndrome-Diabetes Mellitus Registry (ACS-DM Registry) was compiled from consecutive patients between October 1, 2013 and September 30, 2016. The primary end point was repeated revascularisation and the composite outcome was CV death, repeat revascularisation and CV-related readmission, was stratified by renal function stages. The Cox proportional hazards models and propensity score models were applied to six-months, one-year, and two-year post ACS, respectively. Results There were 539 patients with moderate to severe CKD or on dialysis identified from ACS-DM Registry. There were 451 patients eligible for inclusion criteria of which 116 patients were taking ticagrelor and 335 patients were taking clopidogrel. At our two-year follow-up, the unadjusted incidence of primary end point resulted higher in Ticagrelor group (HR 2.09, 95% CI 1.37-3.18, p = 0.001). After adjustment, ticagrelor also had poor primary end point event and composite outcome as compared to clopidogrel (HR 2.24, 95% CI 1.36-3.68, p = 0.002; HR 1.63, 95% CI 1.06-2.48, p = 0.024, respectively). In regards to the repeated revascularisation issue, the clopidogrel was preferable within the eGFR strata (CKD stage III: HR 2.53, 95% CI 1.32-4.84, CKD stage IV: 1.06 (0.09-12.51), CKD stage V: 1.91 (0.80-4.59), P for interaction=0.684). Conclusions Cardiovascular benefits associated with ticagrelor may not be as significant as in the landmark trial. Our results show that patients taking ticagrelor was associated with increased CV events as compared to clopidogrel in ACS-DM patients with stage III-V CKD.propensity score matchingForest plots