Abstract

IntroductionThe authors analyzed results over a 7-year period for a locally manufactured external fixation and traction device (EFTD) used in tibial fracture. Three models were used, depending on the medical and technological context of the healthcare structure in question. The aim of the present study was to reports results for tibial fracture treated by EFTD in low-resource settings. Materials and methodsA multicenter observational study was conducted for the period 2008-2015 in a series of 34 tibial fractures (22 right, 12 left, with 1 bilateral) in 33 young adults (28 male, 5 female; mean age, 42.2 years). Nineteen were closed fractures and 15 open. The 11 recent open fractures comprised 2 Cauchoix-Duparc type I, 3 type II and 6 type III; the 4 older open fractures were infected. Four patients were lost to follow-up. ResultsSeventeen of the patients with closed fracture had very good results, in 75% (6/8) of shaft fractures and 55.55% (5/9) of complex metaphyseal-epiphyseal fractures. In infected fractures older than 48h, there were good results in 25% of cases. In recent open fractures, there were 100% (2/2), 66.6% (2/3) and 20% (1/5) good results for types I, II and III respectively. Five patients showed malunion, well-tolerated functionally. Mean time to bone healing was 16 weeks (range, 12-72 weeks). ConclusionIn developing countries, the pitfall in treating open fractures is delayed surgery due to patients’ socioeconomic situation and to underequipment. The EFTD is a promising technique, readily available at low cost, easy to implement and with minimal iatrogenesis. Level of evidenceIV, prospective observational study.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call