Abstract

BackgroundIn humans, the thumb plays a crucial role in producing finger opposition movements. These movements form the basis of several activities of the hand. Hence these movements have been used to study phenomena like prehension, motor control, motor learning, etc. Although such tasks have been studied extensively, the relative contribution of the thumb vis-à-vis the fingers in finger opposition tasks is not well understood. In this study, we investigated the kinematics of thumb and fingers in a simple finger opposition task. Further, we quantified the relative contribution and the movement smoothness aspects and compared these between fingers and thumb.MethodsEight, young healthy participants (four males and four females) were asked to perform a full finger to thumb opposition movement, where they were required to reach for different phalanges of the fingers. Position (X, Y and Z) of individual segments of the four fingers and the thumb were measured with reference to the wrist by a 16-sensor kinematics measurement system. Displacements and velocities were computed. An index, displacement ratio, that quantifies the relative contribution of thumb and fingers was computed from displacement data. Velocity data was used to quantify the smoothness of movement of thumb and fingers.ResultsThe Displacement Ratio showed that contribution of the thumb is higher than contribution of any other target finger or target phalanges, except for the distal phalanx of the index and middle fingers. Smoothness of movement of the thumb was higher than all the finger phalanges in all cases.ConclusionWe conclude that in the task considered (thumb opposition movements to different targets within the hand & fingers), the thumb made a greater relative contribution in terms of displacement ratio and also produced smoother movements. However, smoothness of thumb did not vary depending on the target. This suggests that the traditional notion of the thumb being a special digit when compared to other fingers is true at least for the opposition movements considered in this study.

Highlights

  • The evolution of opposable thumb in humans is considered to be a crucial feature in the development of fine and dexterous hand movements (Napier, 1956)

  • The second Hypothesis was that between the two effectors that reach for each other, smoothness of movement would be higher for the effector that contributes more to a movement and lesser for the effector that contributes less

  • Finger opposition movement plays a critical role in performing daily activities

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The evolution of opposable thumb in humans is considered to be a crucial feature in the development of fine and dexterous hand movements (Napier, 1956). It is possible to argue that the evolution of thumb in humans has enabled them to produce full finger opposition movements This probably helps humans perform daily activities that require fine and precise control (Signori et al, 2017). The thumb plays a crucial role in producing finger opposition movements These movements form the basis of several activities of the hand. These movements have been used to study phenomena like prehension, motor control, motor learning, etc Such tasks have been studied extensively, the relative contribution of the thumb vis-à-vis the fingers in finger opposition tasks is not well understood. We conclude that in the task considered (thumb opposition movements to different targets within the hand & fingers), the thumb made a greater relative contribution in terms of displacement ratio and produced smoother movements. This suggests that the traditional notion of the thumb being a special digit when compared to other fingers is true at least for the opposition movements considered in this study

Methods
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call