Abstract
Abstract Disclosure: S. Toda: None. A. Takahashi: None. K. Masudo: None. H. Iwasaki: None. Background: Thyroid cancer has a high incidence of actionable genetic alterations, but the frequency of mutations in advanced thyroid cancer that requires drug therapy is unknown. Therefore, we examined the outcomes of genetic testing performed in a real clinical setting for the purpose of pharmacotherapy. Methods: In Japan, Oncomine Dx is approved for thyroid cancer that requires drug therapy, and comprehensive genomic profiling is approved for anaplastic thyroid carcinoma and other thyroid carcinomas after the induction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors. We retrospectively reviewed the cases of those who had their tests performed between 2020 and 2022. Results: The study included 65 patients, and the testing methods used were Oncomine Dx in 36 cases, FoundationOne in 25 cases, and FoundationOne Liquid in 4 cases. With a median age of 74 years (range 17–86), 42 were female and 23 were male. Moreover, 13 cases had anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (ATC), 4 follicular thyroid carcinoma (FTC), 42 papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC), and 6 poorly differentiated thyroid carcinoma (PDTC). Of the PTC examined by Oncomine Dx, 96.8% (30/31) were RAI-refractory; all comprehensive genomic profiling testing cases except ATC had previously been treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors. In the following cases, actionable mutations were observed. Among 13 ATC cases, 46.2% (6) had BRAF mutation and 7.7% (1) had RET fusion. Of 42 PTC cases, 85.7% (36) had BRAF mutation and 7.1% (3) had RET fusion. Of 6 PDTC cases, 33.3% (2) had BRAF mutation and 16.7% (1) had RET fusion. No actionable mutations were observed in FTC (0/4). We found one case each of ATC and PTC with tumor mutation burden of 10 or higher, both with BRAF mutation. NTRK fusion was not observed in any of the 65 patients studied. There were four PTC cases (9.5%) with iodine accumulation in metastases, two with BRAF mutations, one with RET fusion, and one without detectable mutations. Comparing mutations in ATC and non-ATC, TERT promoter mutations were found in 84.6% of ATC (11/13) vs. 56.2% of non-ATC (9/16), whereas TP53 mutations were found in 76.9% of ATC (10/13) vs. 12.5% of non-ATC (2/16). ATC has a significantly higher prevalence of TP53 mutations. Conclusion: Advanced thyroid cancer is more likely to have actionable mutations. BRAF mutations in advanced PTC may be more common than those previously reported in standard PTC. Moreover, ATC has a higher rate of TP53 mutation than other thyroid carcinomas. Presentation: Thursday, June 15, 2023
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.