THU061 Treatment Patterns In Acromegaly: Analysis Of Real-World US Insurance Claims From The MarketScan® Database

Abstract

Abstract Disclosure: M. Fleseriu: Advisory Board Member; Self; Amryt, Ipsen, Recordati Rare Diseases, Pfizer, Inc. Grant Recipient; Self; Amryt, Crinetics, Ionis Pharmaceuticals Inc. A.L. Barkan: None. T.C. Brue: Advisory Board Member; Self; Advanz Pharma, Debio Pharm, Recordati Rare Diseases. Consulting Fee; Self; Ipsen, Recordati Rare Diseases, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer, Inc. Grant Recipient; Self; Pfizer, Inc. Other; Self; Ipsen, Recordati Rare Diseases, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer, Inc. E. Duquesne: Employee; Self; Ipsen. A. Houchard: Employee; Self; Ipsen. Stock Owner; Self; Ipsen. M. del Pilar Schneider: Employee; Self; Ipsen. A. Ribeiro-Oliveira Jr.: Employee; Self; Ipsen. Stock Owner; Self; Ipsen. S. Melmed: Advisory Board Member; Self; Ionis Pharmaceuticals Inc., Ipsen, Novo Nordisk, Recordati Rare Diseases. Grant Recipient; Self; Pfizer, Inc. Background: Medical treatment for acromegaly (characterized by excess growth hormone [GH] production) includes somatostatin receptor ligands (SRLs), dopamine agonists (DAs), and GH receptor antagonists (GHRAs). However, there are few real-world treatment evaluations in the US. We present treatment patterns for patients receiving medications for acromegaly (1/1/2010-7/31/2022). Methods: De-identified data were extracted from MarketScan®, a US health insurance claims database. Eligible patients: those receiving monotherapy or combination therapy (≥2 treatments overlapping for >3 months [m]) for ≥90 days without treatment gaps; ≥2 claims associated with acromegaly; data ≥3 m before and ≥6 m after diagnosis/first treatment claim (earlier date); and ≥18 years (y) old at diagnosis. Outcomes were: demographic characteristics; treatment frequency by line of treatment (LOT) and changes between LOTs (Sankey plot); treatment persistence for first LOT (LOT 1) monotherapies (Kaplan-Meier estimator); and treatment up-/downtitration (≥30% dose change, evaluated for octreotide long-acting release [OCT] and lanreotide depot [LAN]). Biochemical control values were unavailable in the database. Results: Of 882 patients, 50.1% were female; mean age at diagnosis was 48.6 y (standard deviation 13.6 y). In the cohort, 59.4% had exactly 1 LOT, 23.1% had exactly 2 LOTs, and 17.5% had exactly 3 LOTs. The most common LOT 1 medication class was first-generation SRLs: OCT (27.7%) and LAN (21.1%). Other LOT 1 classes were Das (cabergoline; 34.5%) and GHRAs (pegvisomant; 10.5%). Only 7 patients received second-generation SRL pasireotide and no patients received oral octreotide in LOT 1. Most patients initiated treatment with monotherapies (94.6%). In monotherapy LOT 1, GHRAs had the longest median persistence (pegvisomant; 24.8 m; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 16.59-32.49 m; n=93), followed by OCT and LAN (20.0 m; 95% CI: 16.98-23.87 m; n=430). Das had the shortest persistence (cabergoline; 14.4 m; 95% CI: 12.23-16.82 m; n=304). Among patients receiving OCT or LAN, 67.6% had ≥1 dose increase and 45.0% had ≥1 dose reduction. Conclusions: Despite guidelines recommending DA monotherapy for few select patients with acromegaly,1 our real-world analysis found that approximately one-third of patients initiated treatment with this class with the shortest treatment persistence. OCT and LAN monotherapies were also commonly used as LOT 1 and had longer persistence. GHRAs, the class with the longest persistence, were not common monotherapy in LOT 1, possibly because they do not target pituitary adenomas directly. Interestingly, only 5% of patients initiated treatment with combination therapies. Recommendations for individualized therapy2 should consider medication persistence and real-world treatment patterns. 1Giustina et al. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2020 2Fleseriu et al. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2022 Presentation: Thursday, June 15, 2023