Abstract

Background:Nocturnal hypertension (HTN) and non-dipping profile are important predictors of adverse cardiovascular (CV) outcomes. Their associations with subclinical vascular damage in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are still a matter of investigation. It was shown that 10-year atherosclerotic CV disease risk (rASCVD) may be more accurate in CV risk prediction in RA than SCORE. Associations of impaired 24-h BP phenotypes with CV risk in RA are not well-studied yet.Objectives:To assess dipping patterns and nighttime systolic blood pressure (SBPn) and their associations with arterial stiffness and CV risk assessed by rASCVD in patients with RA.Methods:Study group included 90 patients with RA (females 78.7%, age 59.5±14.2 years, HTN 64%, median (med) HTN duration 6.4 years, RA duration – 7.2 years, seropositive RA 66%, mean DAS-28(CRP) 3.8±1.0) and control group (45 patients matched by gender, age and risk factors). All patients with HTN received antihypertensive therapy. Office BP was measured with a validated oscillometric device, 24-hour ABPM was performed with BPLab Vasotens, carotid-femoral PWV was assessed by applanation tonometry. 3 groups were formed after adjustment of dipping state by SBPn: dippers (G1), non-dippers with SBPn<120 mmHg (G2), non-dippers with SBPn≥120 (G3). CV risk in RA group was calculated as 10-year rASCVD. Risk≥7.5% was considered as high. p<0.05 was considered significant.Results:Median rASCVD was 6.3%. Rate of BP control was 60% in RA and 66% in the controls (p=0.5). Patients with RA vs controls had higher mean SBPn (124±16 vs 110±8 mmHg, p=0.003), lower diurnal index (DI) (med 3.8 vs 8.1%, p=0.02), higher rate of night HTN (49.6 vs 12.2% (p=0.0002). The RA and control groups didn`t differ by dipping patterns, although RA patients more often had non-dipping profile (DI <10%): 83.9 vs 61.3%, (p=0.02). RA patients with SBPn ≥120 mmHg had higher age (63.7±12.5 vs 52.9±14.5 years), office SBP (143±17 vs 122±13 mmHg), HTN duration (med 5.4 vs 0.5 years), PWV (10.3±3.0 vs 7.9±2.5 m/s) and rASCVD (12 vs 3.4%), p<0.001 for trend. Analysis in hypertensive RA group confirmed significant differences in PWV (11.3±3.1 vs 9.1±3.2 m/s, p=0.02) and rASCVD (med 13.5 vs 10.5%, p=0.045). Patients with DI<10% had higher age (60.9±13.8 vs 54.3±11 years, p=0.04) and rASCVD (med 8.5 vs 3.1%, p=0.02). Patients with rASCVD ≥7.5% compared to <7.5% had higher SBPn (133±11 vs 112±8 mmHg), lower median DI (0 vs 6%), more often had masked HTN (43 vs 16%) and night HTN (48 vs 16%), p<0.01 for trend. SBPn significantly correlated with age (r=0.6), office SBP (r=0.5) and DBP (r=0.4), PWV (r=0.6), rASCVD (r=0.6); non-dipping pattern – with age (r=0.2), and rASCVD (r=0.3). After adjustment by SBPn, no differences were observed between G2 and G3. Patients in G3 vs G1 had higher PWV (10.4±3.1 vs 7.6±1.7 m/s, p=0.004), CRP (med 15.7 vs 7.8 mg/l, p=0.03), rASCVD (med 12.8 vs 3.1%) (p<0.001); in G3 vs G2 – higher PWV (10.8±3.1 vs 8.2±2.3 m/s), rASCVD (med 12.8 vs 2.7%) and ESR (med 45 vs 21 mm/h, p<0.01 for trend).Conclusion:Patients with RA had higher incidence of non-dipping pattern and SBPn elevation. Combination of high SBPn and non-dipping was associated with higher arterial stiffness and CV risk – this may be mediated by inflammation. Higher CV risk was associated with masked and night HTN. This may help in defining indications for ABPM in this population.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.