Abstract

Background: Involving patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in the assessment of their disease may increase adherence to treatment, improve disease outcomes and reduce consultation time. Objectives: To evaluate the concordance between physician and patient assessment of disease activity in RA using Disease Activity Score (DAS-28). Methods: During the routine consultation, patients were briefed about DAS-28 by their rheumatologist. Using a standard DAS-28 mannequin, physicians, patients and nurses reported the number of tender and swollen joint, inflammatory markers and global health on a 0-10 Likert scale. DAS-28, Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) and Simple Disease Activity Index (SDAI) were calculated blindly by each participant. Agreement between physician- and patient-DAS categories was calculated using weighted kappa (WK) for category comparison. Concordance between physician- and patient-DAS was estimated using the Bland-Altman method. Predictive factors of positive concordance between physician and patient-DAS were identified using logistic regression. Results: Four hundred and twenty patients from 7 Middle-Eastern countries were included, with a mean age of 49 years (SD 12), 84% of females, disease duration of 11 years (SD 8). Mean physician-DAS-28 was 4.03 (SD 1.51). 65% had positive rheumatoid factor, 56% had positive ACPA, 30% had erosive disease and 34% were on biotherapy. Agreement between physician- and patient-DAS categories was 89%, WK was 0.84. WK were 0.80 for DAS physician-nurse, 0.79 for DAS patient-nurse, 0.83 for CDAI physician-patient and 0.88 for SDAI physician-patient agreements respectively. All activity measures were higher in patients compared to physicians, except for the swollen joints count. The mean difference between physician- and patient-DAS was -0.09 [95% CI -0.14; -0.04] and was smaller in patients in remission (Figure 1: Bland Altman plot). Concordance was statistically associated with CRP and patient SDAI. Conclusion: Concordance between patient and physician assessment of disease activity in RA was excellent and was higher using SDAI followed closely by DAS-28 and CDAI. Self-assessment of disease activity should be decided according to the physician’s clinical judgment.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.