Abstract
Chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) affects up to 40% of the US population and thus intervention for symptomatic disease comprises a large portion of many vascular practices. Treatment of CVI has evolved from open surgical treatment to minimally invasive endovenous closure, including either thermal or nonthermal techniques. Thrombotic complications of thermal ablation are well reported with an overall complication rate of less than 2%. However, there is a paucity of high-powered data on the real-world thrombotic outcomes of nonthermal techniques.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Journal of Vascular Surgery: Venous and Lymphatic Disorders
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
