Thrombolytic Therapy Compared with Mechanical Recanalization in Non-acute Peripheral Arterial Occlusions: A Randomized Trial

Abstract

To evaluate whether thrombolytic therapy followed by angioplasty has any added benefit compared with angioplasty alone for the treatment of chronic peripheral arterial occlusions. Twenty patients with claudication or limb-threatening ischemia of at least 3 weeks duration due to iliac or femoropopliteal artery occlusions were randomized either to thrombolytic therapy with recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator for up to 4 hours (n = 11) followed by angioplasty or to angioplasty alone (n = 9). Clinical follow-up was obtained for 1 year. Life-table analysis revealed a significant improvement in the cumulative primary patency rate for patients with claudication treated initially with thrombolysis followed by angioplasty (n = 7; 86% at 6 months; 51% at 1 year) compared with angioplasty alone (n = 9; 11% at 6 months and 1 year) (P < .02). All four patients with limb-threatening ischemia were randomized to thrombolytic therapy, and none exhibited continued patency at 1 year. The most common complication in the thrombolysis group was peripheral embolization; three of these four patients were among those who had limb-threatening ischemia as the indication for entry into this study. There was no increased incidence of bleeding with thrombolytic therapy. A short course of thrombolytic therapy prior to angioplasty appears to improve the 1-year patency rate for claudication due to iliac or femoropopliteal occlusions. However, patients with limb-threatening ischemia have a high prevalence of peripheral embolization and dismal patency rates with this form of therapy. A larger scale study is necessary to confirm these findings.