Abstract

Recently, it has been hypothesized that type 2 diabetes might interfere with acute intravenous thrombolysis effectiveness as estimated by angiographic or electrocardiographic criteria. In our study, we compared the thrombolytic effect of streptokinase infusion between diabetic and non-diabetic myocardial infarction (MI) patients. In a prospective interventional study, 240 consecutive patients who were admitted to the emergency ward and diagnosed with ST-elevation MI (STEMI) were enroled and classified into diabetics (n = 85) and non-diabetics (n = 155). Streptokinase was given to each patient at a dose of 1.5 million units in 1 h. Twelve-lead ECG was recorded immediately before the start of thrombolytic therapy and at 180 min afterwards for the patients with STEMI. The ST-segment elevation resolution was calculated and stratified as complete resolution ( > 70% ST-resolution), partial resolution (30-70% ST-resolution), or failed resolution ( < 30% ST-resolution). Complete ST-resolution occurred in 31.6% of diabetic and 51.0% of non-diabetic patients, respectively (p < 0.001). The incidence of partial ST-resolution in diabetic and non-diabetic patients was 40.5% and 40.0%, whereas 27.8% of patients in the diabetic group and 9.0% of patients in the non-diabetic group showed failed ST resolution. ST-resolution was independent of the location of MI. Multivariate analysis showed that diabetes mellitus, as well as higher Killip class and lower ejection fraction, could effectively predict ST-resolution failure. Failure of ST-segment resolution 180 min after streptokinase infusion is notably higher in diabetic vs non-diabetic patients. This failure rate is correlated with higher Killip class and lower ejection fraction.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.