Abstract

BackgroundVarious studies demonstrate better patient outcome and higher thrombolysis rates achieved by centralized stroke care compared to decentralized care, i.e. community hospitals. It remains largely unclear how to improve thrombolysis rate in decentralized care. The aim of this simulation study was to assess the impact of previously identified success factors in a central model on thrombolysis rates and patient outcome when implemented for a decentral model.MethodsBased on a prospectively collected dataset of 1084 ischemic stroke patients, simulation was used to replicate current practice and estimate the effect of re-organizing decentralized stroke care to resemble a centralized model. Factors simulated included symptom onset call to help, emergency medical services transportation, and in-hospital diagnostic workup delays. Primary outcome was proportion of patients treated with thrombolysis; secondary endpoints were good functional outcome at 90 days, Onset-Treatment-Time (OTT), and OTT intervals, respectively.ResultsCombining all factors might increase thrombolysis rate by 7.9%, of which 6.6% ascribed to pre-hospital and 1.3% to in-hospital factors. Good functional outcome increased by 11.4%, 8.7% ascribed to pre-hospital and 2.7% to in-hospital factors. The OTT decreased 17 minutes, 7 minutes ascribed to pre-hospital and 10 minutes to in-hospital factors. An increase was observed in the proportion thrombolyzed within 1.5 hours; increasing by 14.1%, of which 5.6% ascribed to pre-hospital and 8.5% to in-hospital factors.ConclusionsSimulation technique may target opportunities for improving thrombolysis rates in acute stroke. Pre-hospital factors proved to be the most promising for improving thrombolysis rates in an implementation study.

Highlights

  • Treatment with tissue plasminogen activator or thrombolysis is the most effective therapy for acute ischemic stroke patients within the first 4.5 hours following the onset of stroke symptoms [1,2]

  • We demonstrated a 50% greater likelihood and up to 22% overall rate of treatment with thrombolysis achieved by a stroke center in a centralized organizational model versus nine community hospitals united in a decentralized organizational system of acute stroke care [11]

  • Factors in which the central model performed significantly better than the decentral model were incorporated in the simulation model: lapse between symptom onset to call for help, first responder; i.e. 911 or General Practitioner (GP), Emergency Medical Services (EMS) transport, high priority transport by EMS, and the time from hospital arrival to neurological- and neuroimaging (Computed Tomography, CT) examination

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Treatment with tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) or thrombolysis is the most effective therapy for acute ischemic stroke patients within the first 4.5 hours following the onset of stroke symptoms [1,2]. Currently between 1–8% [3,4,5] are treated with tPA worldwide and around 11% (ranging from 4–26%) within the Netherlands [6], while 24–31% may be achieved in optimized settings [7,8]. Various studies demonstrate better patient outcome and higher thrombolysis rates achieved by centralized stroke care compared to decentralized care, i.e. community hospitals. The aim of this simulation study was to assess the impact of previously identified success factors in a central model on thrombolysis rates and patient outcome when implemented for a decentral model

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.