Abstract

BackgroundSeveral studies have reported on atrial fibrillation (AF) outcomes, including thromboembolism in patients with paroxysmal and non-paroxysmal AF; however the findings still remain controversial on whether risks differ between these clinical subtypes and limited data are available in Asian cohorts.MethodsWe compared the risk of thromboembolism between paroxysmal and persistent AF patients, in a large contemporary Chinese cohort study. A total of 8529 non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients from the Chinese Atrial Fibrillation Registry (CAFR) study were enrolled. The study subjects were divided into two groups: paroxysmal AF (PaAF, defined as AF lasting within 7 days, n = 4642) and persistent AF (PeAF, lasting over 7 days, n = 3887) groups.ResultsIn non-anticoagulated patients, PeAF group demonstrated a higher risk of stroke, all-cause death, cardiac/ non-cardiac death and composition of stroke/ transient ischemic attack (TIA)/peripheral thromboembolism (PT)/all-cause death, compared to the PaAF group. No significant difference was found in anticoagulated subjects. On multivariate analysis in non-anticoagulated patients, age ≥ 75 years (P = 0.046) and prior stroke/TIA/PT (P = 0.018) but not AF type (P = 0.63) were significantly associated with the risk of stroke/TIA/PT events.ConclusionsStroke, all-cause death and cardiac/non-cardiac death in Chinese NVAF population was increased in non-anticoagulated PeAF patients compared with PaAF group, but same between anticoagulated PeAF and PaAF patients. After adjustment, AF type was not an independent predictor of thromboembolism in NVAF patients.Clinical trial registrationChinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR-OCH-13003729. Registered 22 October 2013.

Highlights

  • Several studies have reported on atrial fibrillation (AF) outcomes, including thromboembolism in patients with paroxysmal and non-paroxysmal AF; the findings still remain controversial on whether risks differ between these clinical subtypes and limited data are available in Asian cohorts

  • After excluding those who received successful radiofrequency catheter ablation therapy at baseline and during follow-up, data of 8529 non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients collected between August 2011 and June 2015 were used for the present analyses

  • More patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) less than 40% were in PeAF group compared with PaAF group (P

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Several studies have reported on atrial fibrillation (AF) outcomes, including thromboembolism in patients with paroxysmal and non-paroxysmal AF; the findings still remain controversial on whether risks differ between these clinical subtypes and limited data are available in Asian cohorts. Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia worldwide and is strongly associated with the risk of stroke, thromboembolism and death [1]. Current guidelines recommend oral anticoagulation (OAC) in high risk patients, irrespective of whether the AF pattern is paroxysmal or. The Chinese Atrial Fibrillation Registry (CAFR) is a large contemporary Chinese cohort study, documenting the clinical epidemiology and outcomes in Chinese patients with AF. Wang et al BMC Cardiovascular Disorders (2019) 19:283 thromboembolism between paroxysmal and persistent AF patients

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call